BoP Review in E.W.

[blue]

Breakfast on Pluto in Nov. 25 Entertainment Weekly

If people want it, I can type up the article later -- No new pictures, just a photoshopped one of the picture of Kitten looking at herself in the mirror.

The thing that bothered me -- It got a C-.
The thing that really bothered me -- Things like Harry Potter and Chicken Little got a higher grade than it. (Sorry, but...)

It is, basically, a several paragraphed bash of Pluto. The author doesn't seem to grasp the concept that Kitten is an innocent girl, not a sexual... beast. The author seemed to be pretty narrow-minded in their review, as most critics are.

Anyone else get their EW yet?

[stormy]

Yeah, I got it a few days ago. I was going to post about it, but didn't get around to it. I was just re-reading it today. Another person who just doesn't get it, and finds Kitten "a little boring". Excuse me? Boring? I think not!

[aurora10]

HP deserves an A imo. I haven't seen BOP but come on critics! A c-? WTF is that all about? People annoy me.

[tanya1976]

Guys, let's be mindful that his performance is separate from the overall movie!!!!

Let's not fret!

[aurora10]

Yes! Tanya, you are very right, milady. There have been many times where an actor or actress has gotten nominated but that movie didn't.

[ciaran]

^ottid to what you said Tanya, but I have still have to say, Chicken Little got a higher review? Cmon people! How can Kitten be boring? They obviously slept through 3/4 of the movie or were at the wrong theatre or something. I haven't seen it yet, but still, I know from the clips I've seen that Kitten is anything but boring or a 'sexual beast'.

Hmm...does anyone have a scan of the review by chance? I'd like to see it, but I don't want to make ya type it up Blue.

[avoca]

"sexual beast"? ???is it that what they wrote..? that's ridiculous.. I mean...