|
|
Post by azina on Jul 9, 2005 16:25:41 GMT -5
Oh, it was so amazing seeing "Batman Begins" in IMAX and more importantly seeing Cillian on the HUGE screen and those amazing eyes. I have even a greater admiration for him. I watched his eyes closely in that scene when he's in the prison cell with Falcone and Falcone is trying to intimidate him. Cillian did some amazing acting with his eyes without ever saying a word. The guy is fantastic ... and incredibly gorgeous.  I must say I wanted to scream out B**** when Rachel shot that tazer at Crane's face. Not the FACE!! Poor baby! I'll make you feel better honey! I have hope for future Batman movies. At the end they say "We still haven't caught Crane." Yes!! Work your mayhem baby! |
|
|
|
Post by minui on Jul 9, 2005 16:29:19 GMT -5
Oh yeah, get Scarecrow back in the other movie! Rumours say, he wasn't that big in Batman Returns so they could fully use him in another movie.  Let's go caress poor Craney <3 BTW, Rachel majorly pissed me off in the last 5 minute. Was I the only one who thought she just seemed to change her mind every two minutes? Geez. |
|
|
|
Post by raine on Jul 9, 2005 18:59:29 GMT -5
Oh yeah, get Scarecrow back in the other movie! Rumours say, he wasn't that big in Batman Returns so they could fully use him in another movie. Let's go caress poor Craney <3 BTW, Rachel majorly pissed me off in the last 5 minute. Was I the only one who thought she just seemed to change her mind every two minutes? Geez. yeah i saw it for the 3rd time today and when she shot him w/ the taser i was like NO! Poor Baby! (only my friend could hear me though, we were the only ones up front) |
|
|
|
Post by azina on Jul 9, 2005 20:20:23 GMT -5
Oh yeah, get Scarecrow back in the other movie! Rumours say, he wasn't that big in Batman Returns so they could fully use him in another movie. Let's go caress poor Craney <3 BTW, Rachel majorly pissed me off in the last 5 minute. Was I the only one who thought she just seemed to change her mind every two minutes? Geez. Rachel was a B-- in more was than one. It seemed so un-characterteristic of her to suddenly snub Wayne after pining for him the whole movie. That would be like MJ suddenly deciding to not love Peter Parker because he was Spider-man. Sheesh. Anyhoo, I think they just did that so he could have other love interests. As for Dr. Crane ... he's had a rotten day, poor thing. He definitely needs cheering up and some "play time."  |
|
|
|
Post by raine on Jul 9, 2005 21:36:34 GMT -5
yeah, i didn't understand that whole deal, she rejected him, and THEN they were holding hands?
|
|
|
|
Post by azina on Jul 10, 2005 0:47:47 GMT -5
I thought most guys are pissed off with the "let's be friends" bit. How many friggin' times did he save her life?
|
|
|
|
Post by amy on Jul 10, 2005 2:42:15 GMT -5
Katie Holmes was awful in that movie, so it's good she rejected him. No more Rachel!! woo hoo!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Thebutterfly on Jul 10, 2005 3:34:07 GMT -5
Agreed totally. Katie Holmes isn't good enough for Batman!
|
|
|
|
Post by Thebutterfly on Jul 10, 2005 3:49:58 GMT -5
Oh yeah, get Scarecrow back in the other movie! Rumours say, he wasn't that big in Batman Returns so they could fully use him in another movie. I hope this isn't true, but I read a post somewhere from a Batman comics fan that if Scarecrow were to return, he'd be permanently masked .... coz after he went crazy after a dose of his gas, his Scarecrow mask got permanently fused with his face.... NOOOOO that means we can't see Cillian's gorgeous face ever again |
|
|
|
Post by minui on Jul 10, 2005 4:25:29 GMT -5
That would be awful...  Help me out here, one thing I didn't get in the movie: If Fox was able to make an antidote, why the hell didn't Crane have one? It would have been quite logical if Crane had injected an antidote already, since he was using that gas non-stop. Was the gas just filtered through the mask and that's why it didn't affect him earlier? Argh, I'm confused. |
|
|
|
Post by azina on Jul 10, 2005 10:59:25 GMT -5
I hope this isn't true, but I read a post somewhere from a Batman comics fan that if Scarecrow were to return, he'd be permanently masked .... coz after he went crazy after a dose of his gas, his Scarecrow mask got permanently fused with his face.... NOOOOO that means we can't see Cillian's gorgeous face ever again Okay, if they use Cillian showing the face should be a requirement. In fact, showing him on the screen most of the time should be a requirement. |
|
|
|
Post by raine on Jul 10, 2005 11:01:56 GMT -5
I hope this isn't true, but I read a post somewhere from a Batman comics fan that if Scarecrow were to return, he'd be permanently masked .... coz after he went crazy after a dose of his gas, his Scarecrow mask got permanently fused with his face.... NOOOOO that means we can't see Cillian's gorgeous face ever again Okay, if they use Cillian showing the face should be a requirement. In fact, showing him on the screen most of the time should be a requirement. well i think if they had the same director, they would show his face because this director said he wanted to get as many zoom shots on Cill's face as possible because he has the most beautiful eyes... no joke it's a quote |
|
|
|
Post by azina on Jul 10, 2005 13:26:03 GMT -5
There were some gorgeous zoom shots too and many lovely closeups of those amazing eyes. The choice in glasses really highlighted them beautifully.
|
|
|
|
Post by minui on Jul 10, 2005 13:31:49 GMT -5
I remember that interview, too. He said he was nearly running out of excuses to make Cillian take of the glasses and show those eyes. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by azina on Jul 10, 2005 13:35:20 GMT -5
At least when he had to put on the mask he had to take the glasses off first.
"Would you like to see my mask?"
I don't think Dr. Crane would like me grinning stupidly at him when he asks me that.
|
|
