maeganmarie
Newly Infected
What's the colour of love, pig?
Posts: 31
|
Post by maeganmarie on Aug 29, 2005 1:54:37 GMT -5
k so these critics gave RED EYE 2 thumbs up yay!!!!!!! but all they did was talk to about Rachel and Wes Craven..like they said..oh yeah...cillian murphy was the scarcrow in batman begins..moving on..i was very disappointed since i believe he did and outstanding peformance! *** this is from the show..not the article  |
|
|
|
Post by blue-eyed struck on Aug 29, 2005 2:04:04 GMT -5
Thank you!! I kept checking Ebert's website to see if he had written a review yet, but he hadn't. Really wanted to know what they thought of the movie, so thanks for the update!
|
|
|
|
Post by blue-eyed struck on Aug 29, 2005 2:10:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by amy on Aug 29, 2005 2:20:11 GMT -5
Yay! They never say that they gave it two thumbs up in the ads in newspapers I've seen. That's weird. But that is pretty dumb of them to not talk about Cillian, he was incredible. What other actor could have been better?  ? no one. |
|
|
|
Post by fosforito on Aug 29, 2005 2:31:57 GMT -5
hmm.. did they edited it in the meantime? As far as I´ve read they DO write about Cillian. For exple: "Cillian Murphy is already established and does not need discovering, but here he shows an ability to modulate his character instead of gnashing the scenery."
Well, maybe it´s too strong, as Cillian still gets recognition and people are still "dicovering" him, but I have to say, I like this sentance more than all this stuff written about Rachel McAdams as it´s almost the same I´ve read about her the last weeks. At least, this sentance is something new. Greetz, Alexandra Yay! They never say that they gave it two thumbs up in the ads in newspapers I've seen. That's weird. But that is pretty dumb of them to not talk about Cillian, he was incredible. What other actor could have been better? ? no one. |
|
maeganmarie
Newly Infected
What's the colour of love, pig?
Posts: 31
|
Post by maeganmarie on Aug 29, 2005 3:04:30 GMT -5
yes i'm sure they have but they could have spared a minute on cillian....anyways glad it was a good revieW!
|
|
|
|
Post by amy on Aug 29, 2005 3:09:20 GMT -5
hmm.. did they edited it in the meantime? As far as I´ve read they DO write about Cillian. For exple: "Cillian Murphy is already established and does not need discovering, but here he shows an ability to modulate his character instead of gnashing the scenery."
Well, maybe it´s too strong, as Cillian still gets recognition and people are still "dicovering" him, but I have to say, I like this sentance more than all this stuff written about Rachel McAdams as it´s almost the same I´ve read about her the last weeks. At least, this sentance is something new. Greetz, Alexandra Yay! They never say that they gave it two thumbs up in the ads in newspapers I've seen. That's weird. But that is pretty dumb of them to not talk about Cillian, he was incredible. What other actor could have been better? ? no one. I just saw what Maeganmarie wrote and that made me mad at them |
|
|
|
Post by fosforito on Aug 29, 2005 3:09:32 GMT -5
okay, you´re right, in comparison to Rachel McAdams they really written very little about Cillian ... but here I´d really say "Quality than quantity".. I´m kinda sick of reading interviews and reviews with almost the same content, so I find it kinda refreshing if someone writes sth. else, even it´s not much but you just notice it.. yes i'm sure they have but they could have spared a minute on cillian....anyways glad it was a good revieW! |
|
|
|
Post by Murchadh on Aug 29, 2005 5:48:37 GMT -5
Yep, whats important is what they said and not how much. though it would have been nice to talk to Cillian maybe they had reasons behind it.
|
|
|
|
Post by pluto16 on Aug 30, 2005 20:09:37 GMT -5
I'm just glad that Ebert and Roper finally learned how to pronounce his name. They've been calling him Sillian since 28 Days Later and I almost threw the remote at the tv when they called him that during their Batman preview.
|
|
|
|
Post by ontheedge on Aug 30, 2005 20:24:53 GMT -5
That's a good thing. I can't stand the mispronunciation of his name.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr. J Crane on Aug 30, 2005 20:44:03 GMT -5
Thank you!!!! I have been googling their website for days and days hoping to see what review they gave the movie. I guess it sucks that they didn't mention Cillian much....
And my roomates are still wondering why I was so excited - YEAY!!!!!!!! He (well, the movie) got two thumbs up!!!
Ok - going now to read it....and there might be a site that has a recorded (audio) review - I'll see if I can post the link when it's up.
Thank you!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by ontheedge on Aug 30, 2005 20:46:26 GMT -5
They basically just liked Rachel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dr. J Crane on Aug 31, 2005 15:25:18 GMT -5
Ok, here's the stupid link to the audio review from their TV show. Stupid because they don't even notice Cillian other than pronounce his name correctly. It's all "Rachel this, Rachel that.." - damn!!!!!! oh well...you get to hear him talk about being "Jack Rippner"... tvplex.go.com/buenavista/ebertandroeper/today.html |
|
|
|
Post by raine on Aug 31, 2005 17:48:51 GMT -5
hmpf good review  i'm glad they liked it, but , "The star, Rachel McAdams..." EXCUSE ME?! Cillian was the star as well! |
|
? no one.
i'm glad they liked it, but , "The star, Rachel McAdams..." EXCUSE ME?! Cillian was the star as well!